Forget Rebel, get D For Danger! I don't know why people don't really talk about this shade, it is absolutely gorgeous! Best berry-toned red that MAC carries in my (not so humble) opinion. And believe me I know MAC lipsticks by heart. This is again one of those perfect, universally flattering lipsticks that will look amazing on everyone. Dji assistant 2 mac mavic air.
- Mac D For Danger Lipstick Review
- Mac D For Danger Vs Diva
- Mac D For Danger Swatch
- Mac D For Danger Lipstick On Indian Skin
- MAC D For Danger It’s a gorgeous matte lipstick part of the permanent line but was also released as part of the MAC The Matte Lip Collection. You can also check out my review of MAC Please Me Matte lipstick, from the same collection. This shade is a dupe for the limited edition matte lipstick Heaux from Rihanna’s RiRi.
- Mac Lipstick- D FOR DANGER. 4.5 out of 5 stars 10. 50 $19.49 $19.49. Get it as soon as Mon, Aug 26. FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by Amazon. Only 15 left in stock - order soon. More Buying Choices $16.65 (17 new offers) Little MAC Lipstick 0.06 oz/ 1.77 ml D FOR DANGER.
- Shop for mac lipstick at Nordstrom.com. Free Shipping. Free Returns. All the time.
MAC Lady Danger Dupe Request: NYX Matte Lipstick
--
I got a question regarding what NYX lipstick would be a dupe for MAC’s Lady Danger. Well, I don’t know of any exact dupes currently, but intensity and shade-wise, this is the closest that I can find at the moment.
NYX Matte Lipstick in Pure Red.
It’s a creamy-matte which feels very comfortable on the lips, and is warmer and more orange than MAC Ruby Woo, which is why it’s quite close to Lady Danger (chili-red with an orange kick).
I swatched it next to NYX’s Indie Flick matte lipstick, because I added just a touch of Indie Flick to my lips for the actual 100% Lady Danger dupe. If you’re really on a budget and just want one lipstick, my money’s still on Pure Red, as Indie Flick is a brighter red-orange, more similar to MAC Morange.
--
![Mac d for danger lipstick review Mac d for danger lipstick review](/uploads/1/2/4/9/124907072/529167282.jpg)
P.S. Eye products worn:
- Coastal Scents Hot Pot in Copper Pot on inner half of lids
- 88 Original/Matte Palette soft purple on outer half of lids (the only purple in the blue row)
- MAC Macroviolet Fluid Line along upper lashes (metallic plum/purple)
Application-how did this product apply? glidestugs |
Moisturizing-how moisturizing is this product? hydratingdrying |
Long-Wearing-how long-wearing is this product? stays all daydisappears quickly |
Colour-does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
Pigmentation-how pigmented is this product? |
Luster-how lustrous is this product? |
Buildable-how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? builds easilyhard to build |
Feathering-how feathering is this product? stays putfeathers or bleeds |
Texture-how is the texture of this product? smoothgritty |
Value-how would you rate the value of this product overall? overdeliveredunderdelivered |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Feedback for the application category the current four is a sign that responses to 'how did this product apply?' generally indicate glides. Considering feedback for the colour category the current rating of six indicates considering the question 'does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?' heavily favor true to colour. Considering the pigmentation category the rating of six suggests reviewers in response to the 'how pigmented is this product?' primarily suggest opaque. Reviewing the luster category a rating of one suggests users & critics evaluating 'how lustrous is this product?' generally suggest matte. Looking at review rankings for the texture category an average total of five suggests replies to 'how is the texture of this product?' frequently lean smooth.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
Mac D For Danger Lipstick Review
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
Mac D For Danger Vs Diva
as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
Mac D For Danger Swatch
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
Mac D For Danger Lipstick On Indian Skin
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .